Case Study: Background Vocalist

Posted on February 24th, 2014 by Chhaya Kapadia in Financial Case Studies, Participant Data. 2 Comments

Previous: Income vs. Expense

Mailbox Money: An Overview of Impact on Income

The Background Vocalist makes her money from two main revenue streams: 1) salaried TV work, which has led to more core TV work, and, 2) live performances and recordings as a background vocalist. As a result of these initial income streams, she continues to earn the TV/film mailbox money – or residuals – that are a byproduct of the union contract governing TV and film work. The recording mailbox money from the AFM & SAG-AFTRA Fund is a byproduct of the recording session work.

Over 2009-2010, mailbox money from both television/film and sound recordings has clearly represented a substantial part of the Background Vocalist’s income.


Next: Television Mailbox Money

About the Case Studies

Graphs do not have a Y-axis dollar value in order to observe the conditions of our privacy policy. In addition, graphs and visuals in case studies are not comparable within or between case studies. For more details about this, read about our financial case study protocol.

Information detailed in case studies is based on data received directly from the artist or their authorized representative. The data analysis and lessons learned here are based on individual experience, and do not necessarily reflect the experiences of all musicians in genre or roles.

Case studies are one of three ways this project is looking at music creator income.

2 responses to “Case Study: Background Vocalist”

  1. […] “Case Study: Background Vocalist” peels back more of the curtain raised in “20 Feet From […]

  2. […] “Case Study: Background Vocalist” peels back more of the curtain raised in “20 Feet From […]